google
yahoo
bing


Adobe made some creepy noise

What a bummer. Adobe finally released Flash Player 10 including the new sound enhancements this website asked for. Unlike the promising improvements in the release candidates Adobe released in public, the actual Release Player is neither working as expected nor had Adobe told developers that there will come significant changes in the Sound API.

What changed?
The internal sound control asks Actionscript for more audio data, when the sound card is running out of data. The number of samples you provide can vary between 2048 (~46ms) and 8192 (~185ms). For instance in the Hobnox AudioTool we sent 2048 samples to the sound card and it worked like a charm. This is not the case anymore. Furthermore if you provide more samples once, the latency will increase at runtime and there is no way to decrease it again without stopping the playback. We used to send more data, when expecting CPU critical processes like creating plugins or scale the desktop in our application. That way we could reserve some space for intensive computation while the longer audio buffer was playing. Well, this is also not working anymore. Passing 8192 samples also leads to the enormous latency time of almost one second.

The worst part is in fact, that we were not informed about any of these changes. We would have had some time to react and adapt. Right now this is quite disappointing.

It worked before! What are these changes good for?

More information
Joa Ebert blog
Andre Michelle blog
Joe Berkovitz blog
Kai-Philipp Schöllmann blog


46 Responses to “Adobe made some creepy noise”

  1. 1 marc thiele

    That is really a bummer. What is the intention of the changes? And what now?

  2. 2 Shannon Hicks

    I’m curious about your complaint of lack of time to make changes. I can understand if you’re upset Adobe didn’t detail the changes to how sounds are handled internally. However, Flash Player 10 has been in public beta for many moons now, did you not know about it? I’ve been testing my apps for a couple months now on the beta.

  3. 3 Shannon Hicks

    Flash Player 10 has been in public beta for many moons now. Did you not know the beta was available, or did the changes not show up until sometime between the last release candidate and the actual release?

  4. 4 Constantin Ehrenstein

    For sound enhancement frontrunners like André, of course this is very frustrating.

    I can’t say that I can judge the matter from a fully informed point of view, but to me it seems that there have been some issues with sound configuration on Linux systems.

    As you probably know, Linux support has been a huge priority for Astro, and first tests on Linux systems show indeed stunning stability and performance, which both have been major pains occasionally in earlier releases.

    Then, most of all, sound handling is still far from being as consistent on Linux systems as it is with Mac OS X or Windows (can you say sound multiplexing and Linux in one sentence?), so I am willing to attribute this last-minute-change to a commitment to fully functional software (you can get away with glitches for Linux systems in the beta version, but not in the final release).

    Still, I totally agree that direct and vivid communication indeed has been a staple in the developer / community communication for the last few years, so last minute changes are likely to raise a few eyebrows.

    I’m curious about statements from the Adobe camp, too.

    Best regards
    C.

  5. 5 Kai-Philipp Schöllmann

    @Shannon:

    As you could have read in the post: These changes we are complaining about just appeard in the FP10 Release Player.

  6. 6 Joeflash

    Dudes, log a bug in the Flash Player bugbase and tell everyone so we can vote for it already.

  7. 7 sohbet odalar?

    Thanks you..

  8. 8 cet

    friends thanks a lot for your workshop

  9. 9 chat siteleri

    tenks

  10. 10 sohbet odaları

    thanks fot the info

  11. 11 sohbet odalari

    thank you.

  12. 12 v-pills

    followed it with no hope of getting it work and you know, rest is history. thanks

  13. 13 sohbet

    thanks..

  14. 14 teknozaman personel sistemleri parmak izi tanıma

    Good information.

  15. 15 ahmet

    ADmin tanhks

  16. 16 sarki dinle

    thnxxxx

  17. 17 bedava chat

    good

  18. 18 sohbet odası

    thanks

  19. 19 çet

    fredy

  20. 20 sohbet odaları

    thanks

  21. 21 sohbet odalari

    Thank you for this very useful information.

  22. 22 dekorasyon

    thanks thanks thanks

  23. 23 mantolama

    mantolama Uzman Kuruluş

  24. 24 tempurpedic mattress

    Well, I think it does not matter that much if only the noise is bearable….

  25. 25 Kenar Kontrol

    nere dahılıyon

  26. 26 check up

    Well, I think it does not matter that much if only the noise is bearable….

  27. 27 sohbet odalari

    very nice

  28. 28 health

    This is nevertheless a big step towards future - audio applications within the FlashPlayer.

  29. 29 porno izle

    thanks to admin

  30. 30 Sondaj

    Thanks for the useful tip

  31. 31 meme estetiği

    I reviewed the contents nice ..

  32. 32 vajinismus tedavisi

    I like your site, hands of health ..

  33. 33 ingilizce türkçe sözlük

    i join to adobe’s newslatter, they are working well and always making new extention.

  34. 34 Kompresör

    interesting story

  35. 35 çin topu

    ARe YOu Weryyy solmasıon Ask Ciceqin qel bİraz Daha Qel BİrAz daha ARka Cıksın namelerım Qulkı Sewqılım

  36. 36 sondaj

    very good

  37. 37 canli mac izle

    thanks man nice post..

  38. 38 Sesli

    Thank you for the information your provide…

  39. 39 metzelder

    very good

  40. 40 Yazılı Chat

    Thanks admin good provation.

  41. 41 Sesli Chat

    Thank you very nice admin.

  42. 42 Sohbetci

    Thank you so much admin.eyvallah

  43. 43 Müzik dinle

    Müzik dinle

  1. 1 In Flagrante Delicto! » Blog Archive » What’s Up with Flash Player 10 Final???
  2. 2 Correction - Not creepy! at Adobe, MAKE SOME NOISE
  3. 3 Création site internet bretagne

Leave a Reply