<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe made some creepy noise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/</link>
	<description>A campaign for enhancing Flash audio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeflash</title>
		<link>http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeflash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Dudes, log a bug in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Flash Player bugbase&lt;/a&gt; and tell everyone so we can vote for it already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dudes, log a bug in the <a href="http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP" rel="nofollow">Flash Player bugbase</a> and tell everyone so we can vote for it already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Correction - Not creepy! at Adobe, MAKE SOME NOISE</title>
		<link>http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Correction - Not creepy! at Adobe, MAKE SOME NOISE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-999</guid>
		<description>[...] About        Tags adobe api audio audio&#160;hack bass beta collection correspondence dynamic&#160;audio feature flash flashplayer fmod future hobnox library links onSoundComplete options player release request response sound wired      &#171; Adobe made some creepy noise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About        Tags adobe api audio audio&nbsp;hack bass beta collection correspondence dynamic&nbsp;audio feature flash flashplayer fmod future hobnox library links onSoundComplete options player release request response sound wired      &laquo; Adobe made some creepy noise [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai-Philipp Schöllmann</title>
		<link>http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai-Philipp Schöllmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-930</guid>
		<description>@Shannon:

 As you could have read in the post: These changes we are complaining about just appeard in the FP10 Release Player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shannon:</p>
<p> As you could have read in the post: These changes we are complaining about just appeard in the FP10 Release Player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantin Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantin Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-926</guid>
		<description>For sound enhancement frontrunners like André, of course this is very frustrating.

I can&#039;t say that I can judge the matter from a fully informed point of view, but to me it seems that there have been some issues with sound configuration on Linux systems.

As you probably know, Linux support has been a huge priority for Astro, and first tests on Linux systems show indeed stunning stability and performance, which both have been major pains occasionally in earlier releases.

Then, most of all, sound handling is still far from being as consistent on Linux systems as it is with Mac OS X or Windows (can you say sound multiplexing and Linux in one sentence?), so I am willing to attribute this last-minute-change to a commitment to fully functional software (you can get away with glitches for Linux systems in the beta version, but not in the final release).

Still, I totally agree that direct and vivid communication indeed has been a staple in the developer / community communication for the last few years, so last minute changes are likely to raise a few eyebrows.

I&#039;m curious about statements from the Adobe camp, too.


Best regards
C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sound enhancement frontrunners like André, of course this is very frustrating.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say that I can judge the matter from a fully informed point of view, but to me it seems that there have been some issues with sound configuration on Linux systems.</p>
<p>As you probably know, Linux support has been a huge priority for Astro, and first tests on Linux systems show indeed stunning stability and performance, which both have been major pains occasionally in earlier releases.</p>
<p>Then, most of all, sound handling is still far from being as consistent on Linux systems as it is with Mac OS X or Windows (can you say sound multiplexing and Linux in one sentence?), so I am willing to attribute this last-minute-change to a commitment to fully functional software (you can get away with glitches for Linux systems in the beta version, but not in the final release).</p>
<p>Still, I totally agree that direct and vivid communication indeed has been a staple in the developer / community communication for the last few years, so last minute changes are likely to raise a few eyebrows.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious about statements from the Adobe camp, too.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Flagrante Delicto! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s Up with Flash Player 10 Final???</title>
		<link>http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>In Flagrante Delicto! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s Up with Flash Player 10 Final???</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-916</guid>
		<description>[...] version- a lot of things people did not expect.  For instance, last minute surprise changes to the Sound API&#8230; and then the previously announced security changes that Adobe has, in fairness, warned us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] version- a lot of things people did not expect.  For instance, last minute surprise changes to the Sound API&#8230; and then the previously announced security changes that Adobe has, in fairness, warned us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Hicks</title>
		<link>http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Flash Player 10 has been in public beta for many moons now. Did you not know the beta was available, or did the changes not show up until sometime between the last release candidate and the actual release?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash Player 10 has been in public beta for many moons now. Did you not know the beta was available, or did the changes not show up until sometime between the last release candidate and the actual release?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Hicks</title>
		<link>http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-912</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about your complaint of lack of time to make changes. I can understand if you&#039;re upset Adobe didn&#039;t detail the changes to how sounds are handled internally. However, Flash Player 10 has been in public beta for many moons now, did you not know about it? I&#039;ve been testing my apps for a couple months now on the beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about your complaint of lack of time to make changes. I can understand if you&#8217;re upset Adobe didn&#8217;t detail the changes to how sounds are handled internally. However, Flash Player 10 has been in public beta for many moons now, did you not know about it? I&#8217;ve been testing my apps for a couple months now on the beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc thiele</title>
		<link>http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>marc thiele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.make-some-noise.info/2008/10/16/adobe-made-some-creepy-noise/#comment-910</guid>
		<description>That is really a bummer. What is the intention of the changes? And what now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is really a bummer. What is the intention of the changes? And what now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

